How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Fidelio TAFA3/10 vs Session 900

Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10 vs Skullcandy Session 900

What Fidelio TAFA3/10 does better (3) and where Session 900 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10
Philips · 2026Fidelio TAFA3/10
9.5Score
3 advantages
Higher score
vs
Skullcandy Session 900
Skullcandy · 2026Session 900
9.0Score
2 advantages≈ $150
9.7Sound6.9
8.7Connectivity9.3

Why is Fidelio TAFA3/10 better than Session 900?

  1. Output power100 W vs 50 W2×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Lowest frequency40 Hz vs 50 Hz+25%

Why is Session 900 better than Fidelio TAFA3/10?

  1. Weight3,399 g vs 1,050 g3.2×
  2. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver size—93 mm
Output power100 W50 W
Lowest frequency40 Hz50 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—49 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 3.5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNo—
Battery powered (portable)NoYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.46
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE AudioYesYes
AuracastYesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Optical inputYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight3,399 g1,050 g
Width170 mm—
Height303 mm—
Depth211 mm—
Protection rating—IP67
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx7
Dust protection (IP)—6
ColoursBlackCement, True Black, Primer
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
Remote controlYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare