vs
4.4Battery3.9
Why is HA-S36WS better than Century TAH2000?
- Battery life35 h vs 26 h+35%
Why is Century TAH2000 better than HA-S36WS?
- Weight157 g vs 80 g+96%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5.4+4%
- Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 123 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 35 h | 26 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 157 g | 80 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
