How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Century TAH2000 vs Bobo

Philips Century TAH2000 vs Powerlocus Bobo

What Century TAH2000 does better (1) and where Bobo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips Century TAH2000
Philips · 2025Century TAH2000
1 advantage≈ $20
vs
Powerlocus Bobo
Powerlocus · 2025Bobo
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $25
Higher score
4.0Battery5.7

Why is Century TAH2000 better than Bobo?

  1. Weight80 g vs 158 g+98%

Why is Bobo better than Century TAH2000?

  1. Battery life26 h vs 45 h+73%
Specifications

Side by side

Powerlocus BoboPowerlocus Bobo≈ $254.6
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity123 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life26 h45 h
Battery capacity—380 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight80 g158 g
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare