How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. RB-HJ800 vs TAH8000E

Panasonic RB-HJ800 vs Philips TAH8000E

What RB-HJ800 does better (1) and where TAH8000E wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Panasonic RB-HJ800
Panasonic · 2026RB-HJ800
9.3Score
1 advantage≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH8000E
Philips · 2026TAH8000E
8.3Score
4 advantages≈ $80
7.9Noise control & calls6.4
8.7Battery8.4

Why is RB-HJ800 better than TAH8000E?

  1. Battery life100 h vs 70 h+43%

Why is TAH8000E better than RB-HJ800?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · RB-HJ800: Yes
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  3. Charging time4 h vs 2 h2×
  4. LDACNo · RB-HJ800: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—5
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h70 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Battery capacity—1,100 mAh
Charging time4 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 8 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight260 g260 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare