Why is RB-HF630B better than TAH3209?
- Battery life72 h vs 25 h2.9×
Why is TAH3209 better than RB-HF630B?
- Weight140 g vs 13 g10.8×
- Charging time4 h vs 2 h2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 30 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 112 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 72 h | 25 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 600 mAh |
| Charging time | 4 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 13 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
