How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BuddyPhones Play vs TAH5205WT/00

Onanoff BuddyPhones Play vs Philips TAH5205WT/00

What BuddyPhones Play does better (1) and where TAH5205WT/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Onanoff BuddyPhones Play
Onanoff · 2021BuddyPhones Play
1 advantage≈ $50
vs
Philips TAH5205WT/00
Philips · 2021TAH5205WT/00
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is BuddyPhones Play better than TAH5205WT/00?

  1. Weight150 g vs 210 g+40%

Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than BuddyPhones Play?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 29 h+45%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity75 dB90 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h29 h
Charging time—3.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight150 g210 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare