How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Headphone Pro vs TAH8000E

Nothing CMF Headphone Pro vs Philips TAH8000E

What CMF Headphone Pro does better (1) and where TAH8000E wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Headphone Pro
Nothing · 2025CMF Headphone Pro
7.3Score
1 advantage≈ $75
vs
Philips TAH8000E
Philips · 2026TAH8000E
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
4.8Sound6.1
6.7Noise control & calls6.1
8.8Battery8.4

Why is CMF Headphone Pro better than TAH8000E?

  1. Battery life100 h vs 70 h+43%

Why is TAH8000E better than CMF Headphone Pro?

  1. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  2. Weight283 g vs 260 g+9%
  3. Battery capacity720 mAh vs 1,100 mAh+53%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones55
Noise reduction for callsYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h70 h
Battery life with ANC50 h50 h
Battery capacity720 mAh1,100 mAh
Charging time2 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 8 h10 min → 8 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesYes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight283 g260 g
Protection ratingIPX2—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2—
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare