How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. CMF Clip Pro vs TAH3209

Nothing CMF Clip Pro vs Philips TAH3209

What CMF Clip Pro does better (2) and where TAH3209 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Nothing CMF Clip Pro
Nothing · 2026CMF Clip Pro
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $85
Higher score
vs
Philips TAH3209
Philips · 2024TAH3209
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ $25
5.6Noise control & calls3.8
2.3Battery4.4

Why is CMF Clip Pro better than TAH3209?

  1. Weight6 g vs 13 g2.2×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×

Why is TAH3209 better than CMF Clip Pro?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 25 h2.5×
  2. Battery capacity60 mAh vs 600 mAh10×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH3209Philips TAH3209≈ $254.2
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designOpen-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10.8 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h25 h
Battery capacity60 mAh600 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Design & build
Weight6 g13 g
Protection ratingIP54—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare