vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
3.2Battery6.3
4.2Build & features5.4
Why is FALCON MAX better than WF-C700N?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · WF-C700N: No
- Highest frequency48,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2.4×
- Driver size10 mm vs 5 mm2×
- aptXYes · WF-C700N: No
- LDACYes · WF-C700N: No
Why is WF-C700N better than FALCON MAX?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 10 h+82%
- Battery life with ANC4.5 h vs 7 h+56%
- Earbud weight (each)5.5 g vs 4.6 g+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 5 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 4.5 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 20 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LC3, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.5 g | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Technics EAH-AZ40M2vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX6.06.0
vsTechnics EAH-AZ60M2vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX6.26.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX5.76.0
vsHuawei Freebuds 5vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX6.06.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsNoble Audio FALCON MAXvs
Noble Audio FALCON MAXvsAVIOT TE-J1-AiNA6.06.3