vs
8.0Sound5.8
7.2Noise control & calls9.0
3.2Battery4.3
4.2Build & features3.1
Why is FALCON MAX better than EAH-AZ60M2?
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ60M2: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)5.5 g vs 7 g+27%
- Driver size10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
- Highest frequency48,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+20%
Why is EAH-AZ60M2 better than FALCON MAX?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 7 h+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 8 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 4.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | — | 25 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX, LC3, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.5 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Technics EAH-AZ40M2vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX6.06.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 3 SM-R530vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX5.76.0
vsHuawei Freebuds 5vsNoble Audio FALCON MAX6.06.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsNoble Audio FALCON MAXvs
Noble Audio FALCON MAXvsAVIOT TE-J1-AiNA6.06.3
vs
Denon PerL ProvsTechnics EAH-AZ60M26.46.2