Why is M-271 DB better than TAK2000?
- Weight109 g vs 135 g+24%
Why is TAK2000 better than M-271 DB?
TAK2000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 32 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | 112 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 65 h | — |
| Charging time | 5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 109 g | 135 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
