How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Space Travel vs TAT3509

Moondrop Space Travel vs Philips TAT3509

What Space Travel does better (2) and where TAT3509 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Moondrop Space Travel
Moondrop · 2024Space Travel
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $35
vs
Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
2.3Battery4.6

Why is Space Travel better than TAT3509?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
  2. Driver size13 mm vs 10 mm+30%

Why is TAT3509 better than Space Travel?

  1. Battery life4 h vs 8 h2×
  2. Total with charging case12 h vs 24 h2×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size13 mm10 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance35 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity—104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life4 h8 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case12 h24 h
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight—45 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare