vs
9.2Noise control & calls6.2
Why is Space Travel 2 better than WH-1000XM4C?
Space Travel 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is WH-1000XM4C better than Space Travel 2?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Space Travel 2: Yes
- LDACNo · Space Travel 2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 40 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 106 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 5 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 34 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 27 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 253 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Purple |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAK4200vsMoondrop Space Travel 2vs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsSoundcore C40i Open-Ear Clip-On Kopfhörer kabellos, Graphitgrauvs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsBelkin SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fqvs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsPhilips THE RINGO DUOvs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsVerbatim TruSound ANC Neckband Earbudsvs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsJBL Tune 520BT2