vs
5.6Noise control & calls9.2
Why is Tune 520BT2 better than Space Travel 2?
Tune 520BT2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Space Travel 2 better than Tune 520BT2?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Tune 520BT2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 33 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | 40 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Microphones | 4 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 76 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 5 min → 5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 158 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL Tune 520BT2vsSony WH-CH530vs
JBL Tune 520BT2vsJBL TUNE 530BTvs
JBL Tune 520BT2vsVerbatim TruSound ANC Neckband Earbudsvs
JBL Tune 520BT2vsMoondrop Space Travel 2 Ultra
vs
Philips TAK4200vsMoondrop Space Travel 2vs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsSoundcore C40i Open-Ear Clip-On Kopfhörer kabellos, Graphitgrau