vs
Why is Chu II better than Hear-scape HP-H100BT?
Chu II has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Hear-scape HP-H100BT better than Chu II?
- Driver size10 mm vs 14.8 mm+48%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 14.8 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 280 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 120 dB | 116 dB |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 11 h |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 20 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
