vs
3.8Noise control & calls7.8
6.1Battery4.7
Why is Over-Ear Dual Driver Headphones better than ULT Wear?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · ULT Wear: No
- aptXYes · ULT Wear: No
- Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
Why is ULT Wear better than Over-Ear Dual Driver Headphones?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Over-Ear Dual Driver Headphones: Yes
- Battery life45 h vs 50 h+11%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 2 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 110 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 45 h | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 30 h |
| Battery capacity | 620 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX HD, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 255 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Mondo Over-Ear Dual Driver HeadphonesvsRode NTH-100vs
Mondo Over-Ear Dual Driver HeadphonesvsYamaha YH-E700B5.15.4vs
Mondo Over-Ear Dual Driver HeadphonesvsFiiO JT1vs
Mondo Over-Ear Dual Driver HeadphonesvsSennheiser HDR 120-W
vs
Sony WH-1000XM6vsSony ULT Wear6.56.3
vsKoss Porta Pro Wireless 2.0vsSony ULT Wear