vs
3.8Noise control & calls7.8
Why is 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold better than EAH-A1000?
- Weight260 g vs 306 g+18%
- Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 20 Hz+33%
Why is EAH-A1000 better than 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold?
- Active noise cancellingNo · 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold: Yes
- Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 15 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 90 h |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 260 g | 306 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vs
Sony WH-1000XM6vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vs
JBL Tour One M3vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen)vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vs
Beats 360vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold
vs
Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S3vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Gold

