How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. KH-BT04 vs RS 275

Metz KH-BT04 vs Sennheiser RS 275

What KH-BT04 does better (3) and where RS 275 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Metz KH-BT04
Metz · 2026KH-BT04
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
vs
Sennheiser RS 275
Sennheiser · 2026RS 275
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $210
8.6Noise control & calls3.8
7.7Battery6.5

Why is KH-BT04 better than RS 275?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · RS 275: No
  2. Battery life60 h vs 50 h+20%
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is RS 275 better than KH-BT04?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 6 Hz3.3×
  2. Weight245 g vs 195 g+26%
Specifications

Side by side

Metz KH-BT04Metz KH-BT04≈ $1608.8
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz6 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity—106 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life60 h50 h
Battery life with ANC40 h—
Battery capacity800 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsaptX HDaptX Adaptive, AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesYes
LDACNoNo
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Weight245 g195 g
FoldableYesYes
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare