How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho Y vs KH-BT04

beyerdynamic Aventho Y vs Metz KH-BT04

What Aventho Y does better (4) and where KH-BT04 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho Y
beyerdynamic · 2026Aventho Y
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
vs
Metz KH-BT04
Metz · 2026KH-BT04
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $160
7.8Noise control & calls8.6
9.2Battery7.7

Why is Aventho Y better than KH-BT04?

  1. Battery life90 h vs 60 h+50%
  2. Battery life with ANC60 h vs 40 h+50%
  3. LDACYes · KH-BT04: No
  4. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is KH-BT04 better than Aventho Y?

  1. Weight316 g vs 245 g+29%
  2. aptXNo · Aventho Y: Yes
  3. Battery capacity650 mAh vs 800 mAh+23%
Specifications

Side by side

Metz KH-BT04Metz KH-BT04≈ $1608.8
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life90 h60 h
Battery life with ANC60 h40 h
Battery capacity650 mAh800 mAh
Charging time—1.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 6 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCaptX HD
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoYes
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight316 g245 g
Foldable—Yes
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare