How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Stanmore III vs ULT Field 7

Marshall Stanmore III vs Sony ULT Field 7

What Stanmore III does better (1) and where ULT Field 7 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Stanmore III
Marshall · 2022Stanmore III
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Sony ULT Field 7
Sony · 2024ULT Field 7
3 advantages≈ $270
Dimensions

Size comparison

Stanmore IIIULT Field 7
350 × 203188512 × 224222
Stanmore IIIULT Field 7Difference
Height203 mm224 mm−21 mm
Width350 mm512 mm−162 mm
Depth188 mm222 mm−34 mm
Weight4,250 g6,300 g−2,050 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Stanmore III better than ULT Field 7?

  1. Weight4,250 g vs 6,300 g+48%

Why is ULT Field 7 better than Stanmore III?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Stanmore III: Yes
  2. Lowest frequency45 Hz vs 20 Hz2.2×
  3. LDACNo · Stanmore III: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power80 W—
Speaker channelsStereo—
Lowest frequency45 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life—30 h
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecsSBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
LE AudioYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
HDMI eARC / ARCYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight4,250 g6,300 g
Width350 mm512 mm
Height203 mm224 mm
Depth188 mm222 mm
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare