How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Monitor III ANC vs WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo

Marshall Monitor III ANC vs Sony WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo

What Monitor III ANC does better (3) and where WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Monitor III ANC
Marshall · 2024Monitor III ANC
7.0Score
3 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo
7.0Score
4 advantages≈ $310
7.9Noise control & calls7.9
8.2Battery4.6

Why is Monitor III ANC better than WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo?

  1. Battery life100 h vs 40 h2.5×
  2. Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%
  3. Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%

Why is WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo better than Monitor III ANC?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Monitor III ANC: Yes
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 4 Hz5×
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  4. LDACNo · Monitor III ANC: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz4 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance46 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity92 dB100 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h40 h
Battery life with ANC70 h—
Charging time3 h3.5 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight250 g250 g
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
FoldableYesYes
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare