How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Monitor III ANC vs Signature Pure

Marshall Monitor III ANC vs UltraSone Signature Pure

What Monitor III ANC does better (2) and where Signature Pure wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Monitor III ANC
Marshall · 2024Monitor III ANC
7.0Score
2 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
UltraSone Signature Pure
UltraSone · 2024Signature Pure
3 advantages≈ $200
7.9Noise control & calls4.0

Why is Monitor III ANC better than Signature Pure?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Signature Pure: No
  2. Weight250 g vs 294 g+18%

Why is Signature Pure better than Monitor III ANC?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 8 Hz2.5×
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+75%
  3. Driver size32 mm vs 50 mm+56%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm50 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz8 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz35,000 Hz
Impedance46 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity92 dB114 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h—
Battery life with ANC70 h—
Charging time3 h3 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight250 g294 g
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare