vs
7.8Noise control & calls7.8
9.6Battery4.6
Why is MONITOR III A.N.C. better than WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo?
- Battery life100 h vs 40 h2.5×
- Charging time2.5 h vs 3.5 h+40%
- Driver size32 mm vs 30 mm+7%
Why is WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo better than MONITOR III A.N.C.?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · MONITOR III A.N.C.: Yes
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 4 Hz5×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · MONITOR III A.N.C.: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 35 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 100 h | 40 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 70 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LC3, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 250 g | 250 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sennheiser HD 620SvsMarshall MONITOR III A.N.C.
vs
Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.vsEdifier ED-STXSPTS5
vs
Meze 105 AERvsMarshall MONITOR III A.N.C.
vs
FiiO FT1 ProvsMarshall MONITOR III A.N.C.
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra HeadphonesvsSony WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo
vs
Sennheiser HD 660S2vsSony WH-1000XM5 BNT -Blue Note Tokyo
