How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Monitor II A.N.C. vs EAH-A800

Marshall Monitor II A.N.C. vs Technics EAH-A800

What Monitor II A.N.C. does better (1) and where EAH-A800 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Monitor II A.N.C.
Marshall · 2020Monitor II A.N.C.
4.7Score
1 advantage≈ $210
vs
Technics EAH-A800
Technics · 2022EAH-A800
8.2Score
6 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
6.6Noise control & calls6.9
4.8Battery6.9

Why is Monitor II A.N.C. better than EAH-A800?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is EAH-A800 better than Monitor II A.N.C.?

  1. Battery life45 h vs 60 h+33%
  2. Battery life with ANC30 h vs 50 h+67%
  3. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 4 Hz5×
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  5. Weight320 g vs 298 g+7%
  6. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz4 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω34 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB105 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life45 h60 h
Battery life with ANC30 h50 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Wireless charging (case)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.2
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight320 g298 g
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
FoldableYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare