How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Monitor II A.N.C. vs AONIC 50 SBH2350

Marshall Monitor II A.N.C. vs Shure AONIC 50 SBH2350

What Monitor II A.N.C. does better (3) and where AONIC 50 SBH2350 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Monitor II A.N.C.
Marshall · 2020Monitor II A.N.C.
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ $210
vs
Shure AONIC 50 SBH2350
Shure · 2020AONIC 50 SBH2350
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
6.6Noise control & calls7.8
4.8Battery2.7

Why is Monitor II A.N.C. better than AONIC 50 SBH2350?

  1. Battery life45 h vs 20 h2.2×
  2. Weight320 g vs 334 g+4%
  3. Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%

Why is AONIC 50 SBH2350 better than Monitor II A.N.C.?

  1. Driver size40 mm vs 50 mm+25%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm50 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω39 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB98 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones4—
Battery & charging
Battery life45 h20 h
Battery life with ANC30 h—
Charging time2 h2.5 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight320 g334 g
Water resistance (IPx)IPx0—
FoldableYesYes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare