vs
Why is Mode USB-C better than LAN IEM?
Mode USB-C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is LAN IEM better than Mode USB-C?
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 37,000 Hz+85%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 15 Hz+33%
- Driver size9 mm vs 10 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 37,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 120 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 18 g | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
Related comparisons
vs
Sennheiser CX 80 UvsMarshall Mode USB-C
vs
Sharkoon Stealthbite IEMvsMarshall Mode USB-C
vs
Marshall Mode USB-CvsKiwi Ears Cadenza
vs
Marshall Mode USB-CvsAuvisio Knochenschall-Kopfhörer Bluetooth 5.3, 32GB MP3-Player, IP68
vs
Sharkoon Stealthbite IEMvsMoondrop LAN IEM
vs
Moondrop LAN IEMvsEdifier ED-W280NBPRO
