vs
Why is Mode USB-C better than Stealthbite IEM?
- Weight18 g vs 27 g+49%
Why is Stealthbite IEM better than Mode USB-C?
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- Driver size9 mm vs 10 mm+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 9 mm | 10 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 2 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 87 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 18 g | 27 g |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
