How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Milton A.N.C. vs KH-BT04

Marshall Milton A.N.C. vs Metz KH-BT04

What Milton A.N.C. does better (5) and where KH-BT04 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Milton A.N.C.
Marshall · 2026Milton A.N.C.
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $170
vs
Metz KH-BT04
Metz · 2026KH-BT04
8.8Score
3 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
6.8Noise control & calls8.6
7.7Battery7.7

Why is Milton A.N.C. better than KH-BT04?

  1. Battery life80 h vs 60 h+33%
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 40 h+25%
  3. Weight200 g vs 245 g+23%
  4. LDACYes · KH-BT04: No
  5. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is KH-BT04 better than Milton A.N.C.?

  1. aptXNo · Milton A.N.C.: Yes
  2. Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
  3. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Metz KH-BT04Metz KH-BT04≈ $1608.8
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity99 dB—
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life80 h60 h
Battery life with ANC50 h40 h
Battery capacity—800 mAh
Charging time2 h1.5 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)No—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBCaptX HD
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoYes
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight200 g245 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare