How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton III vs Sound Party

Marshall Emberton III vs Xiaomi Sound Party

What Emberton III does better (2) and where Sound Party wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $140
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Sound Party
Xiaomi · 2026Sound Party
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $75
5.1Sound5.9
9.6Battery8.6
8.2Build & features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Emberton IIISound Party
160 × 6876.9255 × 9292
Emberton IIISound PartyDifference
Height68 mm92 mm−24 mm
Width160 mm255 mm−95 mm
Depth76.9 mm92 mm−15.1 mm
Weight670 g1,200 g−530 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Emberton III better than Sound Party?

  1. Battery life32 h vs 26 h+23%
  2. Weight670 g vs 1,200 g+79%

Why is Sound Party better than Emberton III?

  1. Output power38 W vs 50 W+32%
  2. Lowest frequency65 Hz vs 60 Hz+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size50.8 mm—
Output power38 W50 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency65 Hz60 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life32 h26 h
Battery capacity—5,200 mAh
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 6 h10 min → 2 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
NFC pairing—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight670 g1,200 g
Width160 mm255 mm
Height68 mm92 mm
Depth77 mm92 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Colours—Black, Orange
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
Light effects—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare