How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton III vs MZ7

Marshall Emberton III vs Veho MZ7

What Emberton III does better (6) and where MZ7 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
6 advantages≈ $140
Higher score
vs
Veho MZ7
Veho · 2024MZ7
6.4Score
1 advantage
5.1Sound4.1
9.6Battery6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Emberton IIIMZ7
160 × 6876.9300 × 160102
Emberton IIIMZ7Difference
Height68 mm160 mm−92 mm
Width160 mm300 mm−140 mm
Depth76.9 mm102 mm−25.1 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Emberton III better than MZ7?

  1. Battery life32 h vs 24 h+33%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 5 h2.5×
  3. Lowest frequency65 Hz vs 130 Hz2×
  4. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx6+17%
  5. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
  6. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 18,000 Hz+11%

Why is MZ7 better than Emberton III?

  1. Output power38 W vs 40 W+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size50.8 mm—
Output power38 W40 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency65 Hz130 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz18,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life32 h24 h
Battery capacity—2,500 mAh
Charging time2 h5 h
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 6 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Mains poweredNoNo
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight670 g—
Width160 mm300 mm
Height68 mm160 mm
Depth77 mm102 mm
Protection ratingIP67IPX6
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx6
Dust protection (IP)6—
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare