How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton III vs Revive

Marshall Emberton III vs Tivoli Revive

What Emberton III does better (1) and where Revive wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $140
Higher score
vs
Tivoli Revive
Tivoli · 2022Revive
0 advantages≈ $140

Why is Emberton III better than Revive?

  1. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%

Why is Revive better than Emberton III?

Revive has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size50.8 mm—
Output power38 W—
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency65 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life32 h—
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 6 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Mains poweredNoYes
Battery powered (portable)YesNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35
Bluetooth codecsSBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight670 g—
Width160 mm—
Height68 mm—
Depth77 mm—
Protection ratingIP67—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7—
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare