How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Emberton III vs Session 900

Marshall Emberton III vs Skullcandy Session 900

What Emberton III does better (1) and where Session 900 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Marshall Emberton III
Marshall · 2024Emberton III
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ $140
vs
Skullcandy Session 900
Skullcandy · 2026Session 900
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $150
Higher score
5.1Sound6.9
9.6Battery9.2
5.9Connectivity9.3
8.2Build & features5.5

Why is Emberton III better than Session 900?

  1. Weight670 g vs 1,050 g+57%

Why is Session 900 better than Emberton III?

  1. Battery life32 h vs 49 h+53%
  2. Output power38 W vs 50 W+32%
  3. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
  4. Driver size50.8 mm vs 93 mm+83%
  5. Lowest frequency65 Hz vs 50 Hz+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size50.8 mm93 mm
Output power38 W50 W
Speaker channels2.0—
Channel count2—
Lowest frequency65 Hz50 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
StereoYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life32 h49 h
Charging time2 h—
Quick charge (claimed)20 min → 6 h10 min → 3.5 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Power bank function—Yes
Mains poweredNo—
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.36
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYesYes
AuracastYesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight670 g1,050 g
Width160 mm—
Height68 mm—
Depth77 mm—
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Colours—Cement, True Black, Primer
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
Party / stereo pairing—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare