vs
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
Why is MC-100 better than TAH5205WT/00?
- Lowest frequency15 Hz vs 20 Hz+33%
Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than MC-100?
- Weight232 g vs 210 g+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 15 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 95 dB | 90 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 29 h |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 210 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | White |
