vs
4.0Noise control & calls4.0
Why is ATH-S220BT better than MC-100?
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 15 Hz3×
- Weight180 g vs 232 g+29%
- Highest frequency32,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+60%
Why is MC-100 better than ATH-S220BT?
MC-100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 32,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | 95 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 60 h | — |
| Charging time | 4 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 232 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
