vs
3.4Battery6.1
Why is Tone Free FN6 better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
Tone Free FN6 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than Tone Free FN6?
- Battery life6 h vs 8 h+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 8 h |
| Battery capacity | 55 mAh | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| NFC pairing | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7.6 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel Buds A-SeriesvsLG Tone Free FN63.84.0
vs
Apple AirPods ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods (3rd Gen)vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Google Pixel Buds A-SeriesvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
