vs
5.6Battery6.1
Why is T5 II True Wireless better than WF-XB700?
- aptXYes · WF-XB700: No
Why is WF-XB700 better than T5 II True Wireless?
- Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
- Driver size5 mm vs 12 mm2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 19,000 Hz | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 9 h |
| Battery capacity | 50 mAh | — |
| Charging time | — | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 8 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
