How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. KH-KZ30 vs Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

Kenwood KH-KZ30 vs Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones

What KH-KZ30 does better (2) and where Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KH-KZ30
Kenwood · 2022KH-KZ30
2 advantages≈ $30
vs
Skullcandy Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
4.5Battery3.4

Why is KH-KZ30 better than Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 22 h+59%
  2. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%

Why is Cassette Wireless On-Ear Headphones better than KH-KZ30?

  1. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
  2. Driver size30 mm vs 40 mm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—On-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size30 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—30 Ω
Sensitivity—126 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h22 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight157 g—
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare