How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. KH-KZ30 vs TAH5205WT/00

Kenwood KH-KZ30 vs Philips TAH5205WT/00

What KH-KZ30 does better (4) and where TAH5205WT/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KH-KZ30
Kenwood · 2022KH-KZ30
4 advantages≈ $30
vs
Philips TAH5205WT/00
Philips · 2021TAH5205WT/00
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
4.5Battery2.8

Why is KH-KZ30 better than TAH5205WT/00?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 29 h+21%
  2. Weight157 g vs 210 g+34%
  3. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
  4. Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%

Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than KH-KZ30?

  1. Driver size30 mm vs 40 mm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size30 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—90 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h29 h
Charging time3 h3.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight157 g210 g
FoldableYesYes
Colours—White
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare