How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. KH-KZ30 vs TAH4209

Kenwood KH-KZ30 vs Philips TAH4209

What KH-KZ30 does better (0) and where TAH4209 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood KH-KZ30
Kenwood · 2022KH-KZ30
0 advantages≈ $30
vs
Philips TAH4209
Philips · 2024TAH4209
4.8Score
2 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
4.5Battery6.7

Why is KH-KZ30 better than TAH4209?

KH-KZ30 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAH4209 better than KH-KZ30?

  1. Battery life35 h vs 55 h+57%
  2. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH4209Philips TAH4209≈ $254.8
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size30 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life35 h55 h
Battery capacity—600 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.3
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight157 g160 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare