vs
7.2Noise control & calls6.0
9.3Battery5.6
3.3Build & features3.8
Why is GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T better than EAH-AZ100?
- Battery life14.5 h vs 8 h+81%
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is EAH-AZ100 better than GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T?
- Earbud weight (each)6.7 g vs 5.9 g+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | MEMS | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Dolby Atmos | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 14.5 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 29 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.7 g | 5.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsSamsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro8.08.4vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsSennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 58.07.7vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.9vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100SH-WY8.07.9
vsCambridge Audio Melomania A100vsKenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T7.88.0
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100vsHuawei FreeClip 26.58.6