How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T vs OpenFit 2+ T921

Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T vs Shokz OpenFit 2+ T921

What GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T does better (5) and where OpenFit 2+ T921 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T
8.0Score
5 advantages≈ $300
vs
Shokz OpenFit 2+ T921
Shokz · 2026OpenFit 2+ T921
8.9Score
1 advantage≈ $190
Higher score
9.3Battery8.6
3.3Build & features7.0

Why is GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T better than OpenFit 2+ T921?

  1. Battery life14.5 h vs 11 h+32%
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · OpenFit 2+ T921: No
  3. LDACYes · OpenFit 2+ T921: No
  4. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
  5. Earbud weight (each)6.7 g vs 9.4 g+40%

Why is OpenFit 2+ T921 better than GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeMEMSDynamic
Driver size10 mm—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life14.5 h11 h
Charging time1.5 h—
Wireless charging (case)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)6.7 g9.4 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Colours—OpenFit 2+ Black, OpenFit 2+ Grey, OpenFit 2+ Purple
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare