Dimensions
Size comparison
MuoSRS-XG300
| Muo | SRS-XG300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 216 mm | 138 mm | +78 mm |
| Width | 82 mm | 318 mm | −236 mm |
| Depth | 59 mm | 136 mm | −77 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Muo better than SRS-XG300?
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is SRS-XG300 better than Muo?
- Battery life24 h vs 25 h+4%
- Lowest frequency43 Hz vs 20 Hz2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 40 W | — |
| Speaker channels | — | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 43 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 24 h | 25 h |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Mains powered | — | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 3,000 g |
| Width | 82 mm | 318 mm |
| Height | 216 mm | 138 mm |
| Depth | 59 mm | 136 mm |
| Protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
| Party / stereo pairing | Yes | Yes |
| Light effects | — | Yes |
