How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Muo vs Session 900

KEF Muo vs Skullcandy Session 900

What Muo does better (1) and where Session 900 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

KEF Muo
KEF · 2025Muo
1 advantage≈ $210
vs
Skullcandy Session 900
Skullcandy · 2026Session 900
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ $150
Higher score
6.7Build & features5.6

Why is Muo better than Session 900?

  1. Lowest frequency43 Hz vs 50 Hz+16%

Why is Session 900 better than Muo?

  1. Battery life24 h vs 49 h2×
  2. Output power40 W vs 50 W+25%
  3. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications

Side by side

KEF MuoKEF Muo≈ $210
Sound
Driver size—93 mm
Output power40 W50 W
Lowest frequency43 Hz50 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life24 h49 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 3.5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Power bank function—Yes
Battery powered (portable)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.46
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-C—Yes
USB audioYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—1,050 g
Width82 mm—
Height216 mm—
Depth59 mm—
Protection ratingIP67IP67
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Dust protection (IP)66
Colours—Cement, True Black, Primer
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
Party / stereo pairingYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare