How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Coda W vs Capella

KEF Coda W vs Triangle Capella

What Coda W does better (2) and where Capella wins (2) — every spec side by side.

KEF Coda W
KEF · 2025Coda W
2 advantages≈ $970
vs
Triangle Capella
Triangle · 2024Capella
6.8Score
2 advantages≈ $2,000
Higher score
7.6Sound7.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Coda WCapella
168 × 285268200 × 380
Coda WCapellaDifference
Height285 mm380 mm−95 mm
Width168 mm200 mm−32 mm
Weight11,300 g8,500 g+2,800 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Coda W better than Capella?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Capella: No
  2. Lowest frequency38 Hz vs 42 Hz+11%

Why is Capella better than Coda W?

  1. Weight11,300 g vs 8,500 g+33%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+10%
Specifications

Side by side

KEF Coda WKEF Coda W≈ $970
Triangle CapellaTriangle Capella≈ $2,0006.8
Sound
Output power200 W200 W
Speaker channels2.02.0
Channel count22
Lowest frequency38 Hz42 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX AdaptiveaptX, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesYes
LDACNoNo
USB audioYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Optical inputYesYes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Chromecast / Google Cast—Yes
Multiroom—Yes
Voice assistant built in—Yes
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight11,300 g8,500 g
Width168 mm200 mm
Height285 mm380 mm
Depth268 mm—
Features
Remote control—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare