Why is Coda W better than xboom Rock?
- Output power200 W vs 6 W33.3×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · xboom Rock: No
- aptXYes · xboom Rock: No
Why is xboom Rock better than Coda W?
- Weight11,300 g vs 280 g40.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 200 W | 6 W |
| Speaker channels | 2.0 | — |
| Channel count | 2 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 38 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Mains powered | Yes | No |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| Auracast | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Optical input | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Voice assistant built in | — | Yes |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 11,300 g | 280 g |
| Width | 168 mm | — |
| Height | 285 mm | — |
| Depth | 268 mm | — |
| Protection rating | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Party / stereo pairing | — | Yes |
