How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Coda W vs Stereo L2

KEF Coda W vs Teufel Stereo L2

What Coda W does better (5) and where Stereo L2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

KEF Coda W
KEF · 2025Coda W
5 advantages≈ $970
vs
Teufel Stereo L2
Teufel · 2024Stereo L2
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $1,400
Higher score
7.6Sound7.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

Coda WStereo L2
168 × 285268222 × 1,170300
Coda WStereo L2Difference
Height285 mm1,170 mm−885 mm
Width168 mm222 mm−54 mm
Depth268 mm300 mm−32 mm
Weight11,300 g26,200 g−14,900 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Coda W better than Stereo L2?

  1. Weight11,300 g vs 26,200 g2.3×
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Stereo L2: No
  3. Output power200 W vs 190 W+5%
  4. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 4.2+29%
  5. aptXYes · Stereo L2: No

Why is Stereo L2 better than Coda W?

  1. Lowest frequency38 Hz vs 24 Hz+58%
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+10%
Specifications

Side by side

KEF Coda WKEF Coda W≈ $970
Teufel Stereo L2Teufel Stereo L2≈ $1,4005.9
Sound
Output power200 W190 W
Speaker channels2.02.0
Channel count22
Lowest frequency38 Hz24 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYes—
StereoYesYes
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesYes
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.44.2
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX AdaptiveSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXYesNo
LDACNoNo
USB-C—Yes
USB audioYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Optical inputYesYes
Ethernet—Yes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Multiroom—Yes
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight11,300 g26,200 g
Width168 mm222 mm
Height285 mm1,170 mm
Depth268 mm300 mm
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare