How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-S60W vs Grom Wireless

JVC HA-S60W vs Skullcandy Grom Wireless

What HA-S60W does better (3) and where Grom Wireless wins (0) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-S60W
JVC · 2025HA-S60W
3 advantages≈ $35
vs
Skullcandy Grom Wireless
Skullcandy · 2024Grom Wireless
4.4Score
0 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
5.9Battery5.0

Why is HA-S60W better than Grom Wireless?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 45 h+11%
  2. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
  3. Charging time2.5 h vs 4 h+60%

Why is Grom Wireless better than HA-S60W?

Grom Wireless has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size30 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB113 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h45 h
Charging time2.5 h4 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight149 g—
FoldableYes—
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare