Why is HA-S60W better than TAK4200?
- Battery life50 h vs 45 h+11%
Why is TAK4200 better than HA-S60W?
- Weight149 g vs 129 g+16%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
- Driver size30 mm vs 32 mm+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 32 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | 85 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 45 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 300 mAh |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 149 g | 129 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
