How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Tune Pro vs HA-S60W

EarFun Tune Pro vs JVC HA-S60W

What Tune Pro does better (3) and where HA-S60W wins (2) — every spec side by side.

EarFun Tune Pro
EarFun · 2025Tune Pro
8.4Score
3 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
JVC HA-S60W
JVC · 2025HA-S60W
2 advantages≈ $35
9.6Battery5.9

Why is Tune Pro better than HA-S60W?

  1. Battery life120 h vs 50 h2.4×
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%

Why is HA-S60W better than Tune Pro?

  1. Weight290 g vs 149 g+94%
  2. Charging time3 h vs 2.5 h+20%
Specifications

Side by side

EarFun Tune ProEarFun Tune Pro≈ $508.4
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm30 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity119 dB96 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones5—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life120 h50 h
Battery life with ANC80 h—
Battery capacity1,100 mAh—
Charging time3 h2.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight290 g149 g
FoldableYesYes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare