How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HA-S60W vs TAH4209

JVC HA-S60W vs Philips TAH4209

What HA-S60W does better (1) and where TAH4209 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JVC HA-S60W
JVC · 2025HA-S60W
1 advantage≈ $35
vs
Philips TAH4209
Philips · 2024TAH4209
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
5.9Battery6.7

Why is HA-S60W better than TAH4209?

  1. Weight149 g vs 160 g+7%

Why is TAH4209 better than HA-S60W?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 55 h+10%
  2. Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH4209Philips TAH4209≈ $305.0
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size30 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB112 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—No
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h55 h
Battery capacity—600 mAh
Charging time2.5 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Weight149 g160 g
FoldableYes—
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare